ABSTRACT
We assessed the understanding of Japanese Oriental Medicine, as well as the connection between General Medicine and Japanese Oriental Medicine, among medical students, to improve the effectiveness of clinical practice and lectures. The questionnaires were sent to fifth-year medical students (n=66), and the responses were collected anonymously. Although 22.4% of the responding students were “very” interested in Japanese Oriental Medicine and 68.7% were “slightly” interested, the students who understood Japanese Oriental Medicine even “slightly”comprised only 23.9%. The majority of students considered that the system of Japanese Oriental Medicine was most useful in combination with Western Medicine for practicing General Medicine. Nine (60%) of 15 students who understood Japanese Oriental Medicine considered that the system of Japanese Oriental Medicine was most useful for practicing general medicine. In contrast, among students who did not understand Japanese Oriental Medicine, only 8 of 42 (19%) showed the same response. Similarly, more of the students who understood General Medicine showed this response than students who did not understand General Medicine.<br>These results permit us to speculate that medical students consider that understanding both General Medicine and Japanese Oriental Medicine might contribute to the development of a medical service.
ABSTRACT
We treated two patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who demonstrated different signs from the perspective of traditional medicine. The first case was a 73-year-old woman. In 1977, she consulted a nearby hospital due to bilateral knee joint pain. Her condition was diagnosed as RA. In 1984, she consulted our department for Stage IV and Class III disease. She was treated with Keishi-ni-eppi-itto-ka-ryojutsubu-kagen, and her condition stabilized. In 1994, she received total replacement of the bilateral knee joints. Her ADL increased, but pain at her bilateral wrist, elbow, shoulder and ankle joints persisted. Although she was treated with Yokuininto, as well as bucillamine and salazosulfapyridine, arthralgia persisted. In 1996, her condition was as follows: general malaise, pain at the bilateral shoulder and elbow joints, severe deformity at the wrist joints, dry skin and slender limbs. She walked with a cane. Therefore, we changed the formula from Keishi-shakuyaku-chimoto to Daibofu-to. Thereafter, her symptoms significantly decreased. The second case was a 50-year-old woman. In 1994, she suffered from pain in the right hand, bilateral feet and knee joints. Her condition was diagnosed as RA at a local hospital. In 1996, polyarthralgia increased and she consulted the department of orthopaedic surgery in our hospital. She was administrated bucillamine, but it was discontinued due to eruptions. Then she consulted our department. She was first treated with Keishi-ni-eppi-itto-ka-ryojutsubu, and then with Yokuininto, which did not change her symptoms. Therefore, we tried several DMARDs; however, her condition worsened. In June 2000, her laboratory data were as follows: RF 860U/ml, ESR 72mm/hr, CRP 4.0mg/dl. Although she complained of pain at the bilateral wrist, elbow and ankle joints, there was no deformity in the bilateral wrist or finger joints of either hand. She was a medium-sized person, and without dry skin or edema at the limbs. The administration of Daibofu-to improved her symptoms as well as laboratory data after 3 months of treatment.<br>The clinical signs of case 1 were in accordance with the traditional indications for Daibofu-to. In contrast, those of case 2 differed from these indications with regard to blood-deficiency, since there was no dry skin, change in the nail, dizziness or deformity of the joints. These observations suggest that a subset of patients with RA, who have poor deficiency of blood or Ki, may be another population that can be successfully treated with Daibofu-to.